Did Man City make a mistake selling Cole Palmer to Chelsea? – Analysis of thrilling 4-4 draw

36 opiniones en “Did Man City make a mistake selling Cole Palmer to Chelsea? – Analysis of thrilling 4-4 draw”

1. Cole Palmer made a brilliant move deciding to sign for Chelsea

2. This hype of Palmer is not neccesary. We need atleast 2 seasons to establish his consistency

3. Carney Chuwuemeka 💙

4. No

5. I am a die hard fan of CFC, Man city didn't make a mistake, the young lad needs enough playing time, so he decided to move to CFC to achieve what he desires.

6. They also bought a player from Chelsea:—Mateo Kovacic. It was just fortunate that Chelsea got the right guy, simple
   .

7. If strlng play every match like that he is going to be on the top , but player like him one game good and next not and like that

8. Yes.

9. City always sold their garbage to Chelsea..sterling Titanic and now palmer

10. Doku is so much better

11. He's above average at penalties. Gen z using that single metric to start the Goodall "next Zidane", "next Roman riquelme", "next Sergio busquets" drama ya'll just stop!

12. We didn't make a decision to sell him. We offered him what we could and we love the lad and he loves us, but he chose to persue a role in Chelseas starting 11 and tbh he's their best player atm and looking back at his decision right now it doesn't seem so bad. I wish him the best, I'm happy for him. He's Chelseas player now and we're doing good aswell, so that's that.

13. Guess they can give Cole Palmer the BalonDor…he had the same impact Messi had in a few games at the world cup😂😂!!

14. He's looking like one of few who leave City to be something somewhere else.
    Sturridge was hit and miss, Diaz has disappeared, Sancho was good at Dortmund and now in a world of pain at the swamp, Milner did ok at Anfield, Sterling has taken time to make a consistent difference, Eric Garcia is ordinary at Barca, so to Torres, Silky Ilkay probably will come good there, and the one pulling up trees at the moment is Aleix Garcia at Girona.

15. The hype these people are building on Cole Palmer! I hope for his sake he delivers.

16. Shocking pundits 🤮

17. He scores a goal , now it’s a mistake 😂 lazy journalism

18. Cole Palmer regrets taking up football and not taking up jazz blues.

19. We Chelsea can easily score 4 goals against City at the Etihad because they open up spaces by playing attacking football

20. I think he fits Chelsea’s style of counter attacking play vs cities pure possession. He still wouldn’t get into the city side. Foden provides the same if not better quality in a purely high possession based team.

21. They’ve got Haaland up front and Alvarez on the bench. Palmer’s scored three penalties and everyone is acting like he’s the next the Michael Owen. Any young English player has a few decent games and he gets overhyped.

22. Palmer didn't want to stay, so no. He wanted to play and at City he played very little.

23. Lets be honest. If Cole Palmer didnt leave City he would be a substitute at best. City have a team that many youth academy players woukd struggle to break into. He left and is getting valuable game time.

24. Cole Palmer: Dont look back in anger 😉

25. As a City fan.. the answer is no.. I tend to agree with Pep to let go unhappy players.. it's only bring toxicity to the team harmony if we keep him..

26. He's so so so so overrated
    What he does in chelsea is just scoring penalties

27. No selling a English player doesn’t make any difference to any team

28. Yeah most people recognised this immediately. It should have been a loan and so should Kovacic so he could be returned.

29. Judging by City's trophy cabinet and their position in the league, no.

30. 🤣🤣definitely no ..do we even need to go ther ..he is not good enough ..not better than mahrez ,Silva and Foden …

31. Sky love talking bull, Chelsea have 2 gud games and jesus there back. They have leaders this that and the other, go back about 2 weeks, and they are saying the complete opposite 🙄

32. Maybe not status wise with its history, but Man City squad wise are like Real Madrid they have good players on the pitch and on the bench. Players leaving is never a mistake because it doesnt make difference to their team and they will get a better replacement in asap because they have the cash and pull.

33. Southgate is a plum

34. Pep tried to convince him. He wanted to leave. Chelsea are in midtable. City are top of the table. He's not exactly Messi, City have a lot of equally or more good players. He wouldn't even have been this good at City as he won't have gotten that many games. So yes, City didn't miss out on anything. They got good money for a player that wanted to leave and they go on dominating like they always do

35. Absolutely not. he clearly wasn't good enough to get more play time amongst the city squad. The fact he celebrated his goal shows how ungrateful he is towards the club that made him. Good riddance

36. The bald man on the far right is so well spoken.

Comentarios cerrados.