EXPLAINED! What Sheikh Jassim's withdrawal means for Sir Jim Ratcliffe's proposal



SUBSCRIBE ►
PREMIER LEAGUE HIGHLIGHTS ►
GET THIS SEASON’S PREMIER LEAGUE SHIRTS HERE ►
Kaveh Solhekol explains what Sheikh Jassim’s withdrawal means for the takeover of Manchester United as well as Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s proposal to buy around 25 percent of Manchester United

Watch Premier League LIVE on Sky Sports here ►
►TWITTER:
►FACEBOOK:
►WEBSITE:

MORE FROM SKY SPORTS ON YOUTUBE:
►SKY SPORTS PREMIER LEAGUE:
►SKY SPORTS FOOTBALL:
►SKY SPORTS BOXING:
►SKY SPORTS CRICKET:
►SOCCER AM:
►SKY SPORTS F1:
►SKY SPORTS:
►SKY SPORTS GOLF:

Accede a todas las noticias del fútbol Internacional. ¡Todo el fútbol internacional, aquí! Camisetas MÉXICO

36 opiniones en “EXPLAINED! What Sheikh Jassim's withdrawal means for Sir Jim Ratcliffe's proposal”

  1. The Glazers own Man Utd and are making a healthy profit from them, why would they sell? If you were sat on a rental property that you bought for a small amount but was now valued so much higher that you could remortgage on time and time again and keep on making money on. Why would you? The debts are against Man Utd and not the Glazors. When you are a business person you don't care about it on a personal level. If you are making money then everything else doesn't matter

  2. The most corrupt club owners in premier league history. Been a United supporter since I was 11 years old but now i feel like there is genuinely no hope. I think we are doomed to be a mid-table club at best for a very long time

  3. The Qatari prefer quick dial for the Uber analogous to potentially having Lamborghini.

    That's their level and standard, Manchester United desperately need third bidder instead of current fraudulent parties involved in buying Manchester United.

    Manchester United would not be evaluated £6b in next ten years as the value of the club is twenty times now over last eighteen years. Estimated evaluation of Manchester United could be £10b in next decade and the Glazers have no obligation to sell for however the malleable masses wanted.

  4. The fans are to blame, they went to the games and supported the Glazer family with every pound they put into their hands. The fans allowed the Glazers to sell a minority 25% stake. If they stayed at home, the Glazers would be gone.

  5. Football fans are hilarious Qatar with Turkey, Iran, Syria supported Hamas overthrowing Palestinian authorities in 2006/7. You all hate the Glazers for money issues but you want to twerk for Qatar owners responsible for funding terroirsts killing THOUSANDS OF JEWS. Have some shame Utd Fans but no one will say this cus apparently this is more of an issue then the facts

  6. Who’s 25% did he buy??? Has he bought out certain Glazers family members or has he bought 25% of the 49% the Glazers don’t even own? I don’t see how they can sell anything but their own percentage??? Sad times

  7. There has always been estimates that clubs will be worth closer to 10 billion in the next 5/6 years or so. None of this is surprising. They were never selling. Not genuinely anyway. When they actually sell, completely, they'll look back on this whole excerise as a job well done. Selling in 2023 would be a mistake, financially. And that is literally their only driver.. Profit and good business decision making. It's a shame for the fans because they do not have the same motivation to make the club ultra successful on the pitch. It just needs to be function and exist, bare minimum requirements….. Sad.

Comentarios cerrados.